Self-hosted or SaaS
Compare storage, launch effort, expenses and operational ownership.
Comparison without invented pricing
Compare operating models, not marketing promises
EasyChat is not for everyone: self-hosting offers control and predictable licensing but needs ownership of updates, backups and background jobs.
Free start: 300 delivered operator push targets. The web chat keeps working after the limit; FCM, WebPush and SMS become available with a license.
What you get
Actual cost
Use your own subscription in the calculator instead of fabricated competitor prices.
Verifiable limitations
Account for CMS, channel APIs, hosting and team capacity before choosing.
How it works
Define criteria
Channels, storage, budget, launch speed and support ownership.
Enter your expenses
Compare the one-time license with the subscription you actually pay.
Verify in operation
Install the free package and decide after a real conversation works.
Self-hosted
What to know upfront
Conversations, files, users and settings stay on your server.
- EasyChat does not promise zero operating cost: hosting, implementation and external APIs remain.
- SaaS usually starts faster; self-hosting offers more local control.
- Verify current terms of other products with their providers.
Frequently asked questions
Why are competitor prices omitted?
Plans change; your current numbers produce a more accurate estimate.
Is self-hosted always cheaper?
No. The result depends on hosting, implementation, maintenance and team size.
How can we verify the conclusion?
Use the model comparison, calculator and free package.
Next step
Compare self-hosted and SaaSVerify EasyChat with your own workflow
Start free. Move to a license only after the widget, operator panel and phone work together in your environment.